"The D&O Landscape After Sandusky," DRI Covered Events May 2013

“The recent ruling by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania in Federal Ins. Co. v. Sandusky elicited mixed emotions,” writes Brendan T. Fitzpatrick, a partner in Goldberg Segalla’s Global Insurance Services Practice Group.

Looking at the decision from a purely coverage point of view, Brendan notes, many “wondered whether this decision could ominously portend difficulties for insureds that procured Directors and Officers coverage (D&O). In other words, could this decision be used to deny those that are rightly entitled to D&O coverage?”

In this article, Brendan analyzes the judge’s rulings in the highly publicized Federal Ins. Co. v. Sandusky decision to explore whether the case will bring about any shift in coverage interpretation.

Read the article here: