Partner Thomas F. Segalla and associate James D. Macri discuss the pollution exclusion’s varied interpretation and application in 14 U.S. states in an article for Thompson Reuters and Westlaw Expert Analysis. In “Courts Continue to be ‘Contaminated’ by the Pollution Exclusion: A National Overview,” Tom and James examine recent court decisions that involve the exclusion barring coverage, including the ways in which courts have reached differing conclusions regarding the scope of pollution exclusions, even when presented with substantially similar facts.

Read the article:

• “Courts Continue to be ‘Contaminated’ by the Pollution Exclusion: A National Overview,” Thompson Reuters and Westlaw Expert Analysis, March 8, 2019