Summary Judgment Archives

Category: Summary Judgment

May 6, 2016 • Case Decisions, Federal Officer Jurisdiction, Remand/Removal, Summary Judgment

Fourth Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment on Substantial Factor Causation and Affirms Denial of Remand Based on Federal Officer Jurisdiction

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an opinion in two consolidated appeals upholding the granting of summary judgment to defendants CBS Corporation, General Electric Corporation (GE), MCIC (local insulation contractor), Paramount Packing & Rubber Company, Phelps Packing & Rubber Company, SB Decking, Inc., Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust (local insulation … Continued

May 6, 2016 • Case Decisions, Louisiana, Summary Judgment

Issue of Foreseeable Duty to be Determined by a Jury in Take-Home Exposure Case Against Plant Where Decedent’s Husband Worked

The plaintiffs’ decedent, Elizabeth Sutherland, alleged take-home exposure to asbestos from her first husband’s work clothes. The plaintiff’s first husband, James “Huey” Chustz, worked as an electrician helper for Hershel Leonard Jr. Electric Company from 1964-72. At minimum, he spent 250 days at the sugar mill Alma Plantation, LLC, where he would become covered in … Continued

May 6, 2016 • Case Decisions, Ohio, Summary Judgment

Summary Judgment in Favor of Supplier of Insulation Affirmed on Strict Liability, But Reversed on Failure to Warn

In this case it is alleged that the decedent, Ian Blandford, was exposed to asbestos while working as a pipefitter from 1955 to 1998. The Edward R. Hart Company (Hart) moved for and was granted summary judgment. The plaintiff appealed. On appeal the court affirmed the trial court’s granting of summary judgment on strict product … Continued

May 3, 2016 • Case Decisions, New York, Summary Judgment

Highest New York Court Refuses to Pierce Corporate Veil, Citing Lack of Evidence Establishing Ford USA’s Part in the Chain of Distribution of Ford UK Products

The plaintiff alleged exposure to asbestos-containing brakes, clutches and engine parts while working on Ford tractors and passenger cars in Ireland. The plaintiff and his wife brought suit after he developed peritoneal mesothelioma. Ford USA moved for summary judgment, arguing the parts to which the plaintiff alleged exposure were manufactured, distributed and sold by its … Continued

May 2, 2016 • California, Case Decisions, Summary Judgment

Summary Judgment Reversed on Appeal for Brake Shoe Grinder Manufacturer on the Basis of Foreseeable Hazard With Inevitable Use and Normal Operation of its Non-asbestos Containing Product

The plaintiff’s decedent, who developed breathing difficulties and lung damage as a result of asbestos exposure, filed a lawsuit in state court alleging that from approximately 1958-62, he was a mechanic who utilized brake shoe arcing machines (known as “grinders”) manufactured by the defendant for the purpose of grinding down/reshaping the friction material of brake … Continued

April 27, 2016 • California, Case Decisions, Summary Judgment

Boilermaker Contractor Granted Summary Judgment Over Past Employee as No Proof Existed of Exposure Outside of His Work Directly for Contractor

The plaintiffs filed a wrongful death and survival action claiming their decedent, Michael Walashek, developed mesothelioma from his work as a career boiler maker from 1967-86. The plaintiff’s social security records listed his employers FBS, Inc. and Camass Company, along with others. The case was removed to federal court and FBS, Inc. moved for summary … Continued

April 12, 2016 • Case Decisions, New Jersey, Summary Judgment

Federal Court Analyzes New Jersey State Law in Granting Unopposed Summary Judgment Motions of Six Defendants

In this federal court case, the plaintiff, James McCourt, alleged exposure to asbestos from serving in the Navy (1962-66), working as a pipefitter (1961-62 and 1966-68), home renovations (1952-60), automotive repair work (1959-98), and from the clothing of his father from products manufactured by various defendants. Six defendnats, Guard-Line, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation, Union Carbide Corporation, … Continued

April 5, 2016 • Case Decisions, North Carolina, Punitive Damages, Summary Judgment

Punitive Damages Not Allowed Against Bendix; Memos Showed a Corporation Struggling With Evolving Science on Asbestos and Mesothelioma

The plaintiff alleged that her husband was exposed to asbestos from brakes, and as a result died from mesothelioma. She sued Honeywell International, as successor-in-interest to Bendix, alleging negligence, breach of implied warranty, fraud, failure to warn, and wrongful death, and asked for actual and punitive damages. Bendix moved for summary judgment on the breach … Continued

April 5, 2016 • Case Decisions, Summary Judgment

Various Bits of Evidence Insufficient to Reverse Grant of Summary Judgment to Four Defendants

After the decedent was diagnosed with mesothelioma, he and his wife filed suit against 31 companies alleging asbestos exposure. The case was removed to federal court and transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania MDL. Four defendants — Crane Company, CBS Corporation (Westinghouse), Goulds Pumps, and Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (Buffalo) — were granted summary judgment … Continued

April 1, 2016 • Case Decisions, New York, Summary Judgment

Summary Judgment Overturned on Statute of Limitation Argument as No Proof Offered Linking Past Disease With Mesothelioma Diagnosis

In this take-home exposure case, the plaintiff was diagnosed with malignant epithelial mesothelioma (MEM) on or about August 5, 2010 and commenced her case against various defendants on November 5, 2012. After joinder of issue and discovery, several defendants moved for, and were granted, summary judgment, arguing that the plaintiff’s action was time-barred pursuant to … Continued